Highly skilled GIS Specialist with expertise in geospatial data analysis, remote sensing, and cartography. Proficient in ArcGIS Pro, QGIS, and Python for spatial data processing, automation, and tool development. Experienced in satellite image classification, spatial modeling, and creating actionable geospatial insights using Google Earth Engine (GEE). Strong background in geospatial information management in humanitarian data, disaster risk reduction, and climate data analysis, as well as Oil & Gas spatial data modeling and mapping for sustainable water resource management. Proven ability to deliver technical solutions, collaborate with stakeholders, and manage complex GIS projects effectively. Passionate about leveraging geospatial technologies to support data-driven decision-making and solve real-world challenges.
Working on the development of map (MV1) to be built of Antarctica which highlights every potential critical infrastructure project (within the list of defined types, detailed ahead) that could be developed based on the geographic conditions that allow for each project to be made (for a clear example, seaports can only be made at specific locations). This map will exist as a portfolio of all potential developments that could be made within Antarctica within the scope of defined types of critical infrastructure, including developments that have already taken place.
• The defined types of critical infrastructure that are currently included in the project are:
◦ Transportation (Goods, Services, Private)
◦ Energy
◦ Water & Wastewater Management
◦ Oil & Gas
◦ Health
◦ Food & Agriculture
◦ Critical Manufacturing
◦ Emergency Services
◦ Communications
◦ Military
◦ Digital
◦ Chemical Manufacturing
◦ Mining
◦ Finance
◦ Commercial Facilities
◦ Satellite
◦ Government
• Once the map is complete (MV1), the map is used to engage key stakeholders relevant to Antarctica, such as the national governments of the nations that have claims to the continents, to determine which regional critical infrastructure system projects they would viably support, which they would never support, and all things between. Favorable development projects are then highlighted to produce a completed Antarctic Regional Stakeholder Viability Map (MV2).
• The Antarctic Regional Stakeholder Viability Map (MV2) illustrates all infrastructure projects that could be undertaken, including the stakeholder viability tests for each, showcasing viable projects and helping show the path forward for projects that are not yet viable but could be in time. This map is then fed into an AI model which shows all possible regional critical infrastructure system development path variations based on all possible development projects found to be viable throughout the nations geography.
• This produces the Preferred Antarctic Regional Development Path Map (MV3) which shows the best possible development paths and illustrates why those paths are the best according to all relevant stakeholder interests. MV3 is then used to work with the national planners of each relevant government, and stakeholders, to forge a new path for Antarctic development that can rapidly improve the comprehensive regional critical infrastructure system
Shall be provided upon request